Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- List of Tables -- List of Figures -- 1 Introduction: Toward a Deeper Conceptualisation of Cosmopolitanism in Global Cities -- PART I The Cosmopolitan Environment: Traits, Challenges and Trends -- 2 Sustainable Urban Growth and the Cosmopolitan Environment: The Role of Power in Promoting Diversity, Opportunities and Entrepreneurship -- 3 The Modern Land of Opportunity: Cosmopolitan Cities Attract Independent Immigrants -- 4 From Sand Dunes Northward of Jaffa to a Cosmopolitan City: Tel Aviv Entrepreneurs' Experiences -- 5 Cosmopolitanism and Entrepreneurship in Istanbul and London: A Symbiotic Relationship in Context -- PART II Diversity and Opportunities in Cosmopolitan Cities: Gender and Entrepreneurship -- 6 Female Entrepreneurs in Cosmopolitan Dubai -- 7 Barriers to Female Entrepreneurship in Karachi -- PART III Cosmopolitan Cities in Eastern Europe -- 8 Moscow: A Global City Under Siege -- 9 Kyiv: An Emergent Cosmopolitan City -- PART IV Conclusion -- 10 Entrepreneurship and Governance in Cosmopolitan Cities: Lessons Learned -- Contributor Biographies -- Index.

Purpose
Israel is characterised by economic growth that is accompanied not only by prosperity but also by increasing poverty. This paper aims to conceptualise the role of Israel's social enterprises in reducing the gap between prosperous and disadvantaged populations.


Design/methodology/approach
This qualitative study is based on 23 in-depth interviews. It makes use of a theoretical framework that incorporates two elements: cosmopolitanism and social entrepreneurship. Cosmopolitanism, together with government policies that aim to develop free enterprise and international trade, support entrepreneurship and advance education, accompanies and facilitates prosperity. Whilst prosperity increases inequality, social entrepreneurship develops as a tool to mitigate the side effects of economic growth in the form of the increasing gap between the rich and the poor.


Findings
This paper argues that the principal reason why the gap evolved and is increasing is in the discrepancy between rapidly rising requirements presented by the innovation-focussed economy and the workers' skills. Based on interviews with social entrepreneurs who are (co)founders or managers of businesses with a social purpose, findings show that the gap between prosperity and social deprivation could be bridged by increasing workers' capacity to align their skills with employers' requirements, which is the area to which Israeli social enterprises contribute.


Originality/value
The paper argues that cosmopolitan orientation is one of the contributors to economic growth and innovation, whilst prosperity increases the gap between high- and low-income groups. The paper contributes to the body of knowledge about social entrepreneurs by applying the framework that makes use of cosmopolitanism as an important driver of Israeli social entrepreneurship, which helps to explain the role that social business enterprises play in reducing the gap between prosperous and disadvantaged populations.

Purpose
The paper aims to conceptualise cosmopolitanism drivers from the third-level power perspective by drawing on the Steven Lukes' (1974; 2005) theory of power. Additionally, the paper aims to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurs' cosmopolitan dispositions and habitus, i.e. a pattern of an individual's demeanour, as it was understood by Pierre Bourdieu.


Design/methodology/approach
This conceptual paper makes use of Bourdieu's framework (habitus) by extending it to the urban cosmopolitan environment and linking habitus to the three-dimensional theory of power and, importantly, to the power's third dimension – preference-shaping.


Findings
Once cosmopolitanism is embedded in the urban area's values, this creates multiple endless rounds of mutual influence (by power holders onto entrepreneurs via political and business elites and by entrepreneurs onto power holders via the same channels), with mutual benefit. Therefore, mutually beneficial influence that transpires in continuous support of a cosmopolitan city's environment may be viewed as one of the factors that enhances cosmopolitan cities' resilience to changes in macroeconomic conditions.


Originality/value
The paper offers a theoretical model that allows to enrich the understanding of the power–cosmopolitanism–entrepreneurship link by emphasising the preference-shaping capacity of power, which leads to embedding cosmopolitanism in societal values. As a value shared by political and business elites, cosmopolitanism is also actively promoted by entrepreneurs through their disposition and habitus. This ensures not only their willing compliance with power and the environment but also their enhancement of favourable business conditions. Entrepreneurs depart from mere acquiescence (to power and its explicit dominance) to practicing their cosmopolitan influence by active preference-shaping.

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to survey various meanings attached to a public–private partnership (PPP) and related aspects in Western literature and to identify commonalities and differences between them. Additionally, the article intends to critically assess conflicting and overlapping views on contractual and institutional PPPs, their forms and models and to draw insights for transitional economies.


Design/methodology/approach
The article contrasts and compares views on PPP meanings, forms and models within Western PPP literature and also draws comparisons with understanding of partnership aspects in the Russian language sources. The paper examines theories underpinning PPPs, builds connections to PPP advantages and drawbacks and provides critical assessment of net benefits that PPPs may bring along to the society.


Findings
The article concludes that future PPP research in transitional countries such as Kazakhstan and Russia, particularly in the area of organisational and power arrangements in partnerships, may delineate new concepts such as government as a guarantor of a PPP project, social significance of a PPP project and risk management in a country's contextual environment.


Originality/value
Research in the field of PPPs in transitional countries such as Russia and Kazakhstan is in its infancy. The paper intends to contribute to the body of knowledge about PPPs by providing detailed account and categorisation of their principal meanings, forms, models and underpinning theories and by drawing insights for future research in transitional countries.

Purpose – The paper aims to conceptualise cosmopolitanism drivers from the third-level power perspective by drawing on Lukes' (1974; 2005) theory of power. In addition, the paper aims to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurs' cosmopolitan dispositions and habitus, i.e. a pattern of an individual's demeanour, as understood by Bourdieu. Design/methodology/approach – This conceptual paper makes use of Bourdieu's framework (habitus) by extending it to the urban cosmopolitan environment and linking habitus to the three-dimensional theory of power and, importantly, to the power's third dimension – preference-shaping. Findings – Once cosmopolitanism is embedded in the urban area's values, this creates multiple endless rounds of mutual influence (by power holders onto entrepreneurs via political and business elites, and by entrepreneurs onto power holders via the same channels), with mutual benefit. Therefore, mutually beneficial influence that transpires in continuous support of a cosmopolitan city's environment may be viewed as one of the factors that enhances cosmopolitan cities' resilience to changes in macroeconomic conditions. Originality/value – The paper offers a theoretical model that enriches the understanding of the power-cosmopolitanism-entrepreneurship link, by emphasising the preference-shaping capacity of power, which leads to the embedment of cosmopolitanism in societal values. As a value shared by political and business elites, cosmopolitanism is also actively promoted by entrepreneurs through their disposition and habitus. This ensures not only their willing compliance with power and the environment, but also their enhancement of favourable business conditions. Entrepreneurs depart from mere acquiescence (to power and its explicit dominance), and instead practice their cosmopolitan influence by active preference-shaping.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to survey various meanings attached to a public-private partnership (PPP) and related aspects in Western literature, and identify commonalities and differences between them. Additionally, the article intends to critically assess conflicting and overlapping views on contractual and institutional PPPs, their forms and models, and draw insights for transitional economies. Design/methodology/approach – The article contrasts and compares views on PPP meanings, forms and models within Western PPP literature, and also draws comparisons with understanding of partnership aspects in the Russian language sources. The paper examines theories underpinning PPPs, builds connections to PPP advantages and drawbacks, and provides critical assessment of net benefits that PPPs may bring along to the society. Findings – The article concludes that future PPP research in transitional countries such as Kazakhstan and Russia, particularly in the area of organisational and power arrangements in partnerships, may delineate new concepts such as government as a guarantor of a PPP project, social significance of a PPP project, and risk management in a country's contextual environment. Practical implications – In transitional countries, in which PPPs are in their infancy, clarification of theoretical positions, and identification of commonalities and differences between meanings attached to the PPP terminology may enable better decisions by researchers and practitioners in their selection and further development of partnerships and related concepts. Originality/value – Research in the field of PPPs in transitional countries such as Russia and Kazakhstan is in its infancy. The paper intends to contribute to the body of knowledge about PPPs by providing detailed account and categorisation of their principal meanings, forms, models, underpinning theories, and drawing insights for future research in transitional countries.